|
View previous topic ::
View next topic
|
| Which program do you use to listen your music? |
| Windows Media Player |
|
9% |
[ 5 ] |
| Winamp |
|
56% |
[ 29 ] |
| iTunes |
|
5% |
[ 3 ] |
| Different... |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| other (please specify) |
|
27% |
[ 14 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 51 |
|
| Author |
Message |
 Wurst
Captain
Joined: Apr 13, 2006
Member#: 1782
Posts: 1542
Location: Germany
   
|
 Posted:
Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:24 am Post subject: |
 
|
yes its opensource quite nice  |
|
 |
fumanchu
Cadet 1
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
Member#: 3186
Posts: 2
Location: Nürnberg - Germany
|
|
Posted:
Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
winamp for mp3s, cds and radiostreams
vlc for all kinds of videos (including dvd).... there is nothing better than this app |
|
|
|
 dr_schizo
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: Jul 29, 2006
Member#: 2170
Posts: 272
Location: Liège, Belgium
|
|
Posted:
Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
i tried musikcube, it's good but i think foobar2000 is more in my ergonomy... we can also edit tags etc.
the only reason i tested musikcube is there is no feature "select by leter (with keyboards)" when u have a big playlist, i-e type "k" for jumping to all artists with a name beggining by "k"... so musikcube doesnt it either... so they are both cool cause they can read every sound format and are very light, with essential features... too bad i can't code those fullchill opensources
ps: i am curious about VLC too, now, hehe... and, once again: winamp sux!!! |
|
|
|
 yvesson
Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Member#: 2524
Posts: 98
Location: france, picardy
   |
|
Posted:
Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
Hej,
Well I also use foobar2000 too now for the radios.
It's so much lighter than winamp, and I can easily keep my playlist with different radios on it.
_________________
chainmail bra - howto |
|
|
|
Wurst
Captain
Joined: Apr 13, 2006
Member#: 1782
Posts: 1542
Location: Germany
|
|
Posted:
Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
hmmm i wanna compare foobar with musikcube... anyone link? (too lazy to use google) :P |
|
|
|
dr_schizo
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: Jul 29, 2006
Member#: 2170
Posts: 272
Location: Liège, Belgium
|
|
Posted:
Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
| Wurst wrote: |
| hmmm i wanna compare foobar with musikcube... anyone link? (too lazy to use google) :P |
www.foobar2000.org/ ok, then, this is my preach
 |
|
|
|
 StaticX1440 
Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined: Mar 09, 2005
Member#: 169
Posts: 63
|
|
Posted:
Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
Winamp 5.4 |
|
|
|
 Pesadelo
Admiral (Administrator)
Joined: Feb 18, 2007
Member#: 3090
Posts: 1955
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
|
|
Posted:
Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
| RelaS wrote: |
ihave a decent sound card a 5.1 system but windows media player 10 really boosts music's quality  |
Today I use WMP 11 and (RelaS) it boosts even more the sound quality over a 5.1 system.
I had used WinAmp, but it became too heavy and "bugged". I avoid free-softwares 'cause:
1. I am a programmer and I live from sell software; and
2. I like that NatGeo programs where the GNU is drinking water and the crododile grasps him. 
(you pals can beat me now)  |
|
|
|
Blaspheretic
Commodore
Joined: Jul 01, 2007
Member#: 3647
Posts: 2568
Location: Königsee / Thuringia / Germany
 |
|
Posted:
Sun Aug 26, 2007 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
Winamp only. |
|
|
|
 cjjeepercreeper
Commodore
Joined: Nov 27, 2006
Member#: 2665
Posts: 6146
Location: At the Mountains of Madness
|
|
Posted:
Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
Winamp for all audio.
_________________
Not dead, just sleeping.
Memento Mori |
|
|
|
Wurst
Captain
Joined: Apr 13, 2006
Member#: 1782
Posts: 1542
Location: Germany
|
|
Posted:
Mon Aug 27, 2007 1:15 am Post subject: |
|
I found something interesting... a performance test between different media players like itunes winamp and musikcube... a funny thing is musikcube beated them nearly in every category and is only blasted by foobar...
Look here |
|
|
|
Wurst
Captain
Joined: Apr 13, 2006
Member#: 1782
Posts: 1542
Location: Germany
|
|
Posted:
Mon Aug 27, 2007 1:17 am Post subject: |
|
btw i tried foobar (thx for the link dr_schizo) and i must say i don't like it for some reason... i think the handling of the tool could be some nicer.... its difficult to explain... but foobar is just created for performance ... and i have the feeling for nothing more... |
|
|
|
yvesson
Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Member#: 2524
Posts: 98
Location: france, picardy
|
|
Posted:
Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:37 am Post subject: |
|
[quote="Wurst"]btw i tried foobar (thx for the link dr_schizo) and i must say i don't like it for some reason... i think the handling of the tool could be some nicer.... its difficult to explain... but foobar is just created for performance ... and i have the feeling for nothing more...[/quote]
Hej,
Well so what ? Today too few softwares are made for perfomances.
I'm happy it does its job and loads fast.
_________________
chainmail bra - howto |
|
|
|
Wurst
Captain
Joined: Apr 13, 2006
Member#: 1782
Posts: 1542
Location: Germany
|
|
Posted:
Mon Aug 27, 2007 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
yeah but i bet you use a GUI instead of using a console for you OS ... and you know what? because auf comfortability reasons... and thats what i miss on foobar :P |
|
|
|
 SeclusionSolution
Commodore
Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Member#: 2031
Posts: 3595
Location: Papua New Guinea
|
|
Posted:
Mon Aug 27, 2007 11:58 am Post subject: |
|
winamp 5.07
proposed this to Jeric some time ago via email to get rid of the useless crap
streams and get mor bandwidth on the traffic but i didn´t know there was
already a poll. Good job Wurst
_________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
