|
View previous topic ::
View next topic
|
| What high bitrate stream is most appealing to you? |
| 192k MP3 |
|
23% |
[ 10 ] |
| 128k MP3 |
|
20% |
[ 9 ] |
| 128k aacPlus |
|
32% |
[ 14 ] |
| 192k Ogg |
|
18% |
[ 8 ] |
| 128k Ogg |
|
2% |
[ 1 ] |
| 128k WMA |
|
2% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 43 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Nikos
Cadet 1
Joined: Mar 26, 2007
Member#: 3249
Posts: 3
   
|
 Posted:
Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:08 pm Post subject: |
 
|
Vorbis (what you people call Ogg) is better than everything currently. Listening tests also confirm it. Tied second is AAC+.
192k Vorbis is transparent to the source (if the source is lossless, like a CD rip in clean WAV or FLAC format). |
|
 |
 JERIC 
Fleet Admiral (Proprietor)
Joined: Oct 04, 2004
Member#: 1
Posts: 1518
Location: Richmond, VA
  
      |
|
Posted:
Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
By the way, most of our source files are Lossless WMA. thanks for weighing in.
_________________
"It's all Venger's fault! We oughtta do something about that guy. " -Eric
Please do not PM me! Use email, feedback or contact us links. |
|
|
|
Death_Medic
Vice Admiral (Moderator)
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
Member#: 1099
Posts: 2025
Location: Chicago
|
|
Posted:
Thu Mar 29, 2007 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
192 is just crazy 128 is good enough. You really cant tell to much when you listen to it.
_________________
- Does this hurt ? -
 |
|
|
|
SchwarzLicht
Cadet 1
Joined: Feb 15, 2010
Member#: 10097
Posts: 1
|
|
Posted:
Sat Oct 16, 2010 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
quality matters! traffic not. 192kpbs is nothing for modern Internet connection even can use it on mobile without Problem |
|
|
|
 Basher
Commodore
Joined: Feb 19, 2010
Member#: 10128
Posts: 3826
Location: Ebil domain
|
|
Posted:
Sat Oct 16, 2010 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
128aac....
_________________
i am so ebil that i piss darkness |
|
|
|
 diginferno
Rear Admiral (Ambassador)
Joined: Apr 11, 2006
Member#: 1771
Posts: 3182
|
|
Posted:
Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
Folks, this is a very old thread. Please try to look at the timestamp of the first message because, sometimes, your opinions are no longer meaningful if enough time has passed since the topic was created.
FYI, some of those 128k streams used to be here until, say, a year ago. Then, after careful consideration and traffic analysis, they were removed in order to optimize the station. It turned out that the 64k AAC+ sounded better than some 128k streams.
_________________
diginferno
.::  ::. |
|
|
|
Basher
Commodore
Joined: Feb 19, 2010
Member#: 10128
Posts: 3826
Location: Ebil domain
|
|
Posted:
Sat Oct 16, 2010 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
| diginferno wrote: |
Folks, this is a very old thread. Please try to look at the timestamp of the first message because, sometimes, your opinions are no longer meaningful if enough time has passed since the topic was created.
FYI, some of those 128k streams used to be here until, say, a year ago. Then, after careful consideration and traffic analysis, they were removed in order to optimize the station. It turned out that the 64k AAC+ sounded better than some 128k streams. |
sorry......, pls could u lock these old "important looking" polls?
_________________
i am so ebil that i piss darkness |
|
|
|
diginferno
Rear Admiral (Ambassador)
Joined: Apr 11, 2006
Member#: 1771
Posts: 3182
|
|
Posted:
Sat Oct 16, 2010 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
You're right, Basher. I locked it.
_________________
diginferno
.:: ::. |
|
|
|
|
|
