|
View previous topic ::
View next topic
|
| What high bitrate stream is most appealing to you? |
| 192k MP3 |
|
23% |
[ 10 ] |
| 128k MP3 |
|
20% |
[ 9 ] |
| 128k aacPlus |
|
32% |
[ 14 ] |
| 192k Ogg |
|
18% |
[ 8 ] |
| 128k Ogg |
|
2% |
[ 1 ] |
| 128k WMA |
|
2% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 43 |
|
| Author |
Message |
 JERIC 
Fleet Admiral (Proprietor)
Joined: Oct 04, 2004
Member#: 1
Posts: 1518
Location: Richmond, VA
     
      |
 Posted:
Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:40 pm Post subject: High bitrate streams? |
 
|
I am satisfied with DFM sound quality but just out of curiosity...
_________________
"It's all Venger's fault! We oughtta do something about that guy. " -Eric
Please do not PM me! Use email, feedback or contact us links. |
|
 |
 Wurst
Captain
Joined: Apr 13, 2006
Member#: 1782
Posts: 1542
Location: Germany
|
|
Posted:
Tue Oct 31, 2006 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
I'm completely satisfied with ogg 64k Stream  , but the MP3 128 would be nice too^^
Greetings,
Wurst |
|
|
|
 dr_schizo
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: Jul 29, 2006
Member#: 2170
Posts: 272
Location: Liège, Belgium
|
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:29 am Post subject: |
|
i really think that AAC+ 64k is the better choice here, better than the ogg one. i don't know why but, though i like ogg for my personal audio files, the ogg stream just sounds crashy... maybe at 192 k it should be better...
well ivoted 128k AAC + but i think this is absolutelly not necessery... coz aac+64k sounds like a 192mp3... just clear |
|
|
|
 Dark
Commodore
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Member#: 589
Posts: 3246
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
|
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:50 am Post subject: |
|
I love the 64 ogg stream, it sounds fucking awsome. But the 192 ogg stream must crystal clear, and even tho i think it would be overdoing it giving that quality, i would be just satistfied with 128 and 64. |
|
|
|
Death_Medic
Vice Admiral (Moderator)
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
Member#: 1099
Posts: 2025
Location: Chicago
|
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:03 pm Post subject: |
|
I went with 128 aac but the 192 mp3 would be bad ass to
_________________
- Does this hurt ? -
 |
|
|
|
Dead_Relic
Cadet 1
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Member#: 2597
Posts: 3
Location: An unmarked mauseoleum
|
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
So, what's the excuse in not upgrading the stream kbps? |
|
|
|
JERIC
Fleet Admiral (Proprietor)
Joined: Oct 04, 2004
Member#: 1
Posts: 1518
Location: Richmond, VA
|
|
Posted:
Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
| Dead_Relic wrote: |
| So, what's the excuse in not upgrading the stream kbps? |
I don't have an excuse but I have reasons. Those being...
1. It is very expensive to run +128k streams.
2. 64k aacPlus sounds as good if not better.
3. It is very expensive to run +128k streams.
4. 64k aacPlus sounds as good if not better.
5. It is very expensive to run +128k streams.
6. 64k aacPlus sounds as good if not better.
_________________
"It's all Venger's fault! We oughtta do something about that guy. " -Eric
Please do not PM me! Use email, feedback or contact us links. |
|
|
|
 SeclusionSolution
Commodore
Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Member#: 2031
Posts: 3594
Location: Papua New Guinea
|
|
Posted:
Sat Nov 18, 2006 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
well my computer is overdone with the winamp mp3 but thats my system...
i think the 128kbs mp3 sound would be enough  |
|
|
|
Dead_Relic
Cadet 1
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Member#: 2597
Posts: 3
Location: An unmarked mauseoleum
|
|
Posted:
Sat Nov 18, 2006 11:58 pm Post subject: |
|
My computer sound is patched through a stereo system. Believe me, 128kbps beats 64k. |
|
|
|
DanielHahn
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Member#: 1388
Posts: 481
Location: Land of Depression
|
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:40 am Post subject: |
|
i take!!!!!! 32k!!!!!!! aacPlus 4me good enogh ,hahha
cheers (fucked up )analbirth  |
|
|
|
 Specksturm
Cadet 2
Joined: Oct 23, 2006
Member#: 2496
Posts: 5
Location: Helsinki FINLAND
|
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 02, 2006 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
There was a period when I lived with a completely crappy sound. The vocals on everything was close to gone. Just instrumetnal death-metal all day long. I was close to give Death FM a nice slit on its aorta, but before that I triend another set of headphones. Whoah! , everything was like a real death again.
64k aacPlus is my choice of self torture.
_________________
|
|
|
|
Death_Medic
Vice Admiral (Moderator)
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
Member#: 1099
Posts: 2025
Location: Chicago
|
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 02, 2006 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
Glad you stayed spec
_________________
- Does this hurt ? -
|
|
|
|
diginferno
Rear Admiral (Ambassador)
Joined: Apr 11, 2006
Member#: 1771
Posts: 3182
|
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 23, 2006 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
192k Ogg sounds interesting, I like the open formats. I currently listen the 32k ogg (bandwidth, bandwidth) because the 32k aac+ stream went bananas someday (or was it just the winamp? dunno). All I can tell is that I'm quite satisfied with the sound.
_________________
diginferno
.::  ::. |
|
|
|
korban_tv
Ensign
Joined: Mar 10, 2007
Member#: 3169
Posts: 34
Location: Indonesia
|
|
Posted:
Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
do not upgrade bitrate stream pleaseeee...
in indonesia, internet line is still very..very..very expensive..huhuhu..hiks..*crying*
im using a 64 kbps bandwith at my office..it's high bandwith enough here in indonesia..*is it sound so 'primitive'?? poor indonesia*
when in a 'rush hour', song playing @ death.fm get lag..buffering..
huhuhu..hiks..*still crying*
so i hope Jeric do not upgrade bitrate stream..
thx |
|
|
|
VileVince
Commander
Joined: Mar 21, 2005
Member#: 213
Posts: 665
Location: Oregon
|
|
Posted:
Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
Split between 192k mp3 and 192 ogg, although I'm completely content with 64k ogg  |
|
|
|
|
|
